I've made a promise to myself to read one book about
photography every month. Some months I succeed, other months I don't. It's a
convenient excuse really; an excuse to buy photo books and books about
photography. This can be an expensive proposition; good photobooks aren't
cheap. On the other hand books about photographic design and criticism are few
and far between.
I've been fortunate though to find a good source in Calgary.
Besides "Fairs Fair", a used bookstore, there's HomeSense. HomeSense
is like an upscale Liquidation World and from time to time gets surplus photo
books from sources unknown. These books are all in good nick and seldom cost
more than 10 to15 bucks. The only problem is that the selection is pretty hit
and miss and sometimes months go by without a photo book appearing.
Pleasant Surprise
Although I'm not a huge fan of Ansel Adams, "Unseen
Ansel Adams: Photographs from the Fiat Lux Collection" was a suprise to
find in HomeSense. The
Fiat Lux Collection was the result of a three year project for the Centennial of the University of California
resulting in apecial centennial book, "Fiat Lux: The University of California".
To quote from the UC Berkely Bancroft Libray's Fiat Lux web page:
"Fiat Lux was intended not as a document of the
university as it was, but rather a portrait of the university as it would be.
Kerr [University President at the time) asked the artists to project through
words and photographs, as far as possible, “the next hundred years”—
impossible, of course, but a provocative invitation that the artists embraced.
The Fiat Lux project was a massive endeavor, producing 605 fine prints and over
6,700 negatives, far more than the 1,000 images stipulated in Adams’s contract.
After Adams’s lifetime devotion to Yosemite, Fiat Lux was probably the biggest
single project of his life."
"Unseen" is an extract of that collection. Some
commentards on Amazon slag this book; I have to disagree with them. This was a
commercial documentary project and often (as I've found working on the Heritage
Park 50 Project) you can't put all of your art and soul into all the images.
You have to shoot x, y and z and unfortunately x and y leave you cold while z
shows some artistic possibilities. As a pro you give x and y your best effort
to try to impart some artistic sensibilities to it but in the end it ends up as
just another image.
Having said that, I enjoy this book much more than many of
the other Adams collections that Adams Inc. have been pushing out the door. As
I indicated above, I'm not a huge fan of Adams; perhaps I've been saturated by
his Yosemite photos. I do find the work that everybody goes ga-ga over, while
technical tour-de-forces from an exposure and printing perspective, lacking
something. To me they fail to capture the visceral nature of his subjects and
sit cold and lifeless on the page staring back at me as I ask them the question
"What are you trying to tell me?"; the answer is stoney silence.
(Perhaps, as well, I'm still narked by that line in his autobiography that the
Canadian Rockies where boring and didn't present any true photographic
possibilities)
The images in this book, while exhibiting the same technical
prowess that is a hallmark of all of Adams' work are much more pleasurable for
me. I look at them and try to deconstruct, to actually read the image. Some of
the images have an impishness to them while others show a sense of wonder of
the natural and the man-made world. The aerial work is stunning and the
documentary photos showing the work of the University tells the story clearly
and draws you in, studying with the students and the professors trying to
understand what they are thinking.
If you find this book, take the time to read the images.
I've learnt some things about telling stories in one image and I'm applying it
to my street-work.
Tough Sledding
There are two books that are giving me no end of difficulty
keeping to that promise: Sontag's "On Photography" and Barthes
"Camera Lucida". Everytime I start one of these I end up like
Sisyphus rolling this huge intellectual boulder up hill only to get interrupted
and have it come crashing back down with me, running like Indiana Jones, trying
to get the heck out of the way. I've been trying for 4 months now and I still haven't been able to swipe the idol from the temple (to horribly mangle the metaphor)
Both of these books require, for my marginal intellectual
abilities at least, uninterrupted time sitting somewhere quiet. Of the two,
Barthes presents the toughest sledding, not the least because it is a
translation from the French. As well, he has a quirky writing style filled with
asides, diversions and convolutions. The combination can leave my mind twisted
into some unknown Wonderlandian topological construct.
Sontag presents only a slightly lighter intellectual boulder
to push up the hill. A much more direct writer she covers similar ground but
from an American perspective. Neither Barthes nor Sontag are photographers, (in
fact Barthes claims never to even taken a snapshot) but instead are
philosophers. As such they are able to separate the mechanics (compositional
theory, exposure, etc.) from the ideas presented by photography. Barthes begins
by asking "What is a Photograph", Sontag begins by looking at the act
of "taking a photograph". Again, following some of her arguments
leaves me in bit of mental pretzel.
I will persevere and finish both these books as the ideas
Barthes and Sontag present are worth trying to understand. Part of this journey
to find my photographic vision and voice is to wrestle with ideas presented by
people such as these and by understanding them (or not) grow in an
understanding of this art form.
It's going to be an interesting Christmas break.